What to do if vaccines are mandated?

[WARFAB]

PtOMNr644EWN.jpeg

[WARFAB]

[dwa12479]

How I miss the days before SNL was nothing but a political hack job.

[WARFAB]

Some interesting stats collected by Walgreens.

https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp

Walgreens2.jpeg

Walgreens1.jpeg

[usmcveteran]

About what you would expect to see with ineffective vaccine. More people are "vaccinated" so more from that group is positive.
experts are already saying 75% of kids have already had COVID.

[WARFAB]

Did we determine religious exemptions have to be honored or not?

I've been contacted by a potential employer twice now. The first time they were having an open house for potential new recruits and said jabs are required unless I have a health or religious exemption. I said I would need a religious exemption and then never hear back from them.

Fast forward 6 months and an HR rep from that company contacted me again. We went through all the basics then after everything seemed done, she sent me an 'oh I forgot, jabs are required' email and I said I would need a religious exemption.

I think the Viva and Barnes podcast was saying religious exemption requests have to be honored...? Is this a case where they'd just say they didn't want me for some other reason to avoid legal consequences?

[Norm DeGuerre]

Just say Yes
It's not like you have a Rabies Tag around your neck

[Norm Deguerre x2]

Just offer an Affirmative answer.

[Norm Deguerre x2]

It's not like you have a rabies tag, or something around your neck

[usmcveteran]

Did we determine religious exemptions have to be honored or not?

I've been contacted by a potential employer twice now. The first time they were having an open house for potential new recruits and said jabs are required unless I have a health or religious exemption. I said I would need a religious exemption and then never hear back from them.

Fast forward 6 months and an HR rep from that company contacted me again. We went through all the basics then after everything seemed done, she sent me an 'oh I forgot, jabs are required' email and I said I would need a religious exemption.

I think the Viva and Barnes podcast was saying religious exemption requests have to be honored...? Is this a case where they'd just say they didn't want me for some other reason to avoid legal consequences?

It's been a few months since I've been pretty up to date on all this but here's my take.

First of all this prospective employer has contacted you TWICE. That shows that you are obviously qualified for this position and they like you. Otherwise they wouldn't of reached out twice.

Do you have email from first time when they said you needed jab or medical or religious exemption?

It would seem you have argument for discrimination based on religion.

Religious exemptions are broken down into 2 parts.

Part one is that you have a sincerely held religious belief that prevents you from getting vaccine. In most cases employer has to assume you do if you say you do.

Part two is where they have the wiggle room to deny request. If you exemption would create an undue hardship on the company they can deny the request.

In your original communication they said you needed jab or medical or religious exemption. So they are implying those are options and that it would not create an undue hardship.

Maybe they just want to hear you have a current exemption but not go into detail?

Something I personally might do is send another follow up email to HR saying you're checking in. That they reached out too you twice and that you are interested in the job and just wanted to make sure that your need for religious accommodation isn't why you haven't heard back yet.

[dwa12479]

I would have a hard time staying at my job if they required the jab, as in I would do everything I could to stay there and not get it. But it would bother me immensely to work somewhere who would do that to their people..

I would find it impossible to TAKE a job thst required the jab.

[WARFAB]

Hoping different options pan out. At this point, companies still mandating the jab are denying some pretty clear science.

[WARFAB]

Pfizer dumped 80,000 pages of documents, but everyone was too busy paying attention to the SCOTUS decision leak.

It will be interesting to see what all comes out as people pore over the newly released documents.

https://brownstone.org/articles/on-w...izer-claim-95/

[/URL]A key section buried within this document, which alludes to possibly the real VE at that time, is the following damning data below (found on page 42).


These were people showing actual symptoms. If you calculate the VE from these numbers, it’s a staggeringly low 12%. VE is calculated by dividing the difference between the case numbers in the placebo and vaccine groups, by the case number in the placebo group x 100 = VE of 12 %

This is a vast climb down from the 95% VE generated by easily manipulated PCR tests, conducted in a central lab chosen by Pfizer. What’s even more alarming, is that this data was known almost a year and a half ago, by the FDA themselves.

I can't say for sure that this author's interpretation is completely accurate, but at this point it's also very safe to say that the Pfizer jab definitely doesn't have efficacy anywhere near 95% in the real world.

[WARFAB]

Pfizer.jpeg

[WARFAB]

The part that's killing me about these new revelations about the vaccine efficacy is that it appears to be exactly what I suspected as soon as they said the vaccine immunity wanes over time.

Covid wasn't completely rampant at the time they were testing the vaccine so comparing the placebo and test groups was pointless and both groups were merely reacting to the natural odds of getting sick. Both groups were still statistically random. Adding in the fact that they were discounting Covid symptoms obviously makes it worse.

As soon as they said the vaccine wore off over time, the gig was up. Aside from not meeting the definition of a vaccine, a vaccine that 'wears off over time' is also difficult to distinguish from a vaccine that does nothing. Your odds of getting the virus go up over time, so both charts of likelihood of getting Covid are the same whether you're vaxxed or not. Even a 12% difference could be a statistical anomaly in the number of trial participants they used.

The Walgreens stats are the real deal based on a larger number of people over a longer time frame. The entire goofiness about changing the dictionary definition of a vaccine was a pointless psy-op, and a pretty scary indication of just how orwellian the global elites have become.

[usmcveteran]

All the evidence was there from the start and if you said anything you became the enemy and were marginalized. CDC also over estimated vaccination rates.

Push come to shove the government will likely blame the companies for misrepresenting the data.

I just read Fauci was upset that they did the white house correspondent dinner. He said that people seem tired of pandemic and he is worried how that will effect the at risk groups.

Obviously he wasn't worried about the at risk groups when they gave privilege to the vaccinated who could still catch and spread COVID giving a false sense of security.

It's all a joke and what happens when we don't believe the government during the next pandemic?

[WARFAB]

Sounds like the fat lady is singing. Lawsuits are coming.

Entities with COVID-19 vaccine mandates that don’t pay heed to the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance will face lawsuits, a civil liberties lawyer says.

“We don’t have a new lawsuit in the works yet. But if we see that colleges and universities and public employers are not responding to the new CDC guidance the way that they should be, then we would certainly tee up a new lawsuit,” Mark Chenoweth, president and general counsel at the New Civil Liberties Alliance, told The Epoch Times.

The response to the updated guidance should be, at a minimum, a lifting of mandates for people who have recovered from COVID-19, he added.

Such people have a high level of protection against severe illness and death, according to a number of studies. Many studies indicate the protection is higher than that of the COVID-19 vaccines—including one study funded by the CDC.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...-update-lawyer

[WARFAB]

Ummm.... pretty sure I'm never getting the flu shot again.


Screenshot_20221005-204309_Brave.jpg