Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Federal Judge rules CA magazine restrictions unconstitutional

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by WARFAB View Post
    Judge Benitez issues a stay of his ruling starting at 5:00pm tonight. The window for Californians to buy standard cap magazines ends at 5:00, but possession of them will remain legal until the appeal to the 9th circuit is complete. No idea if it possession would then remain legal until a SCOTUS ruling is complete if there is another appeal. This will be very interesting to watch. I have no idea how Trump's appointments to the 9th circuit might impact this case. I think I just read something about another rule change allowing his appointments to proceed to a vote? Lots of different moving parts right now.
    I'm extremely curious as to why he'd stay his own decision.
    Old enough to know better, still too young to care

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by camper4lyfe View Post

      I'm extremely curious as to why he'd stay his own decision.
      You know damn well that it was political pressure exerted by all the states that have magazine bans currently in place.....the Judge's well-written decision will (hopefully) strike ALL magazine bans as unconstitutional. That would lead to a domino effect eventually nullifying almost all other infringements such as bans based on physical features, etc.
      Beer is like porn, you can buy it but it's more fun to make your own

      I have to bend over too far

      I get a boner.

      bareback every couple of days, GTG. Bareback, brokeback, same $hit!

      I joined a support group to help me deal with my social anxiety but I just can't seem to work up the nerve to go to a meeting......

      Comment


      • WARFAB
        WARFAB commented
        Editing a comment
        Thug with the unusually optimistic post.

    • #18
      Originally posted by camper4lyfe View Post

      I'm extremely curious as to why he'd stay his own decision.
      This article explains why he probably did it, and it looks like a good move by this explanation.

      https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/cal...#axzz5lTlIb9hC
      https://psynq.com/

      Praying things get better.

      Comment


      • #19
        Originally posted by WARFAB View Post

        This article explains why he probably did it, and it looks like a good move by this explanation.

        https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/cal...#axzz5lTlIb9hC
        I do believe I came across that once. It definitely makes sense that he stayed it vs the 9th. That could have turned out UGLY for a LOT of people.
        Old enough to know better, still too young to care

        Comment


        • #20
          Originally posted by camper4lyfe View Post

          I do believe I came across that once. It definitely makes sense that he stayed it vs the 9th. That could have turned out UGLY for a LOT of people.
          So now how does California prove someone didn't buy their magazine during the window provided by judge Benitez? Seems like he essentially legalized all standard capacity magazines until the 9th circuit rules differently. But, with Trump teed up too appoint 9th circuit judges in the near future, do we know for sure how the 9th will rule on the matter?

          https://psynq.com/

          Praying things get better.

          Comment


          • #21
            Originally posted by WARFAB View Post

            So now how does California prove someone didn't buy their magazine during the window provided by judge Benitez? Seems like he essentially legalized all standard capacity magazines until the 9th circuit rules differently. But, with Trump teed up too appoint 9th circuit judges in the near future, do we know for sure how the 9th will rule on the matter?
            My guess is that they would require someone to show a dated receipt for it/them.
            Old enough to know better, still too young to care

            Comment


            • WARFAB
              WARFAB commented
              Editing a comment
              Sounds like all kinds of fun. Someone could make money selling fake receipts.

          • #22
            The case is Duncan v. Becerra(9thCir. Aug. 14, 2020) __ F.3rd__ [2020 U.S.App. LEXIS 25836

            https://law.justia.com/cases/federal...020-08-14.html
            sic semper boogaloo

            Comment


            • #23
              The word on social media is that Judge Lee was one of the "rooftop Koreans" during the 1992 LA riots.
              https://psynq.com/

              Praying things get better.

              Comment

              Working...
              X