Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SAFE act legal challenge updates

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by WARFAB View Post
    Please let this not be an overly optimistic interpretation of what's going on.
    Seems legit lol...

    It is clear that Keller, and by extension, Imperial Criminal Cuomo and his minions occupying the imperial palace in Albany, are terrified at the prospect of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the intermediate scrutiny standard as applied to Second Amendment cases. Such an action on the part of the court would signal the death knell for New York gun control, and the state has real reason to worry that their fear will make the jump to reality.

    Comment


    • #17
      I am betting the SCOTUS is going to kick the can down the road on this one by simply ruling that strict scrutiny is the standard when deciding 2A cases, as opposed to something monumental like ruling that the RTKBA extends outside of the home. Still, requiring strict scrutiny opens up a challenge to every single 2A infringement currently upheld by appeal on the basis of "public safety". Still a long road ahead......
      Beer is like porn, you can buy it but it's more fun to make your own

      I have to bend over too far

      I get a boner.

      bareback every couple of days, GTG. Bareback, brokeback, same $hit!

      I joined a support group to help me deal with my social anxiety but I just can't seem to work up the nerve to go to a meeting......

      Comment


    • #18
      Originally posted by thughes View Post
      I am betting the SCOTUS is going to kick the can down the road on this one by simply ruling that strict scrutiny is the standard when deciding 2A cases, as opposed to something monumental like ruling that the RTKBA extends outside of the home. Still, requiring strict scrutiny opens up a challenge to every single 2A infringement currently upheld by appeal on the basis of "public safety". Still a long road ahead......
      Forcing strict scrutiny, by itself, seems like it could be a HUGE game changer, as we keep getting screwed in NY by intermediate scrutiny.
      Old enough to know better, still too young to care

      Comment


      • #19
        Originally posted by camper4lyfe View Post

        Forcing strict scrutiny, by itself, seems like it could be a HUGE game changer, as we keep getting screwed in NY by intermediate scrutiny.
        The courts in NY have shown a blatant disregard for prior SCOTUS decisions and the Constitution in general.....what makes you think that any new rulings are going to change that?
        Beer is like porn, you can buy it but it's more fun to make your own

        I have to bend over too far

        I get a boner.

        bareback every couple of days, GTG. Bareback, brokeback, same $hit!

        I joined a support group to help me deal with my social anxiety but I just can't seem to work up the nerve to go to a meeting......

        Comment


        • WARFAB
          WARFAB commented
          Editing a comment
          The quotes from the NYS supreme court judges in the article suggests some deference to SCOTUS rulings.

      • #20
        Originally posted by thughes View Post
        The courts in NY have shown a blatant disregard for prior SCOTUS decisions and the Constitution in general.....what makes you think that any new rulings are going to change that?
        The courts may show blatant disregard for prior SCOTUS rulings, but based on registration numbers alone, the gun owners of the state are showing a blatant disregard for the NY court rulings. A law only works if the people believe it's legitimate. A SCOTUS ruling saying strict scrutiny is the rule for 2A cases further undermines the ridiculousness in NY and will only embolden gun owners.

        Individually, the process becomes the punishment and that's no small thing. But collectively, having thousands of gun owners appeal their charges isn't something the NY court system wants.

        https://psynq.com/

        Praying things get better.

        Comment


        • #21
          Originally posted by WARFAB View Post

          The courts may show blatant disregard for prior SCOTUS rulings, but based on registration numbers alone, the gun owners of the state are showing a blatant disregard for the NY court rulings. A law only works if the people believe it's legitimate. A SCOTUS ruling saying strict scrutiny is the rule for 2A cases further undermines the ridiculousness in NY and will only embolden gun owners.

          Individually, the process becomes the punishment and that's no small thing. But collectively, having thousands of gun owners appeal their charges isn't something the NY court system wants.
          On this note, it is refreshing to see sheriffs and city councils declaring 2A Sanctuary or otherwise refusing to comply with recently passed enhanced BG check and red flag laws in WA, OR, NM, CO, MD, IL, etc. I am heartened by this growing "We will not comply" movement, especially as the charge seems to be led by LE figures.
          Beer is like porn, you can buy it but it's more fun to make your own

          I have to bend over too far

          I get a boner.

          bareback every couple of days, GTG. Bareback, brokeback, same $hit!

          I joined a support group to help me deal with my social anxiety but I just can't seem to work up the nerve to go to a meeting......

          Comment


          • #22
            As if on queue: https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/...ctuary-status/


            Sign the petition: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pet...cond-amendment
            Beer is like porn, you can buy it but it's more fun to make your own

            I have to bend over too far

            I get a boner.

            bareback every couple of days, GTG. Bareback, brokeback, same $hit!

            I joined a support group to help me deal with my social anxiety but I just can't seem to work up the nerve to go to a meeting......

            Comment


            • #23
              Originally posted by camper4lyfe View Post

              Forcing strict scrutiny, by itself, seems like it could be a HUGE game changer, as we keep getting screwed in NY by intermediate scrutiny.
              bear in mind this "scrutiny" thingy is a fabrication of the Courts
              to enable discretion to find as they wish --
              sic semper boogaloo

              Comment


              • thughes
                thughes commented
                Editing a comment
                Stop harshing my buzz dude......

              • Norm DeGuerre
                Norm DeGuerre commented
                Editing a comment
                I'm not there, KupKake ..

                the bogus "scrutiny" thingy needs to be removed from the Courts
                the problem is that no Attorney will challenge the un-Constitutionality of such "scruttiny" to ignore the "CONstitution", and simply look at Statute

                I am soo dissapointed the John Lott did not want to entertain this discussion with me about New York
                never an Answer back ...

            • #24
              In other news.......
              https://psynq.com/

              Praying things get better.

              Comment


              • camper4lyfe
                camper4lyfe commented
                Editing a comment
                What is that?

            • #25
              camper4lyfe

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...y_Donald_Trump

              https://psynq.com/

              Praying things get better.

              Comment

              Working...
              X