Can anyone (ND?) help me understand how New Yorkistan's universal background check requirement still stands if the FBI refuses to do checks for personal transfers in Nevada? Does the FBI feel it is more of a priority to do checks for New York residents than Nevada residents for some reason?
http://www.reviewjournal.com/local/nevada/nevada-s-new-gun-background-check-law-ends-it-begins
http://www.reviewjournal.com/local/nevada/nevada-s-new-gun-background-check-law-ends-it-begins
CARSON CITY — A new Nevada law requiring background checks for private party gun sales was deemed unenforceable Wednesday, days before it was to take effect because the FBI refuses to conduct them and the state lacks authority to do so.
Ballot Question 1, narrowly approved by voters in November, was set to take effect Sunday. It required background checks on private-party gun transfers, similar to sales made when someone buys a gun through a federally licensed dealer.
But unlike retail sales, the initiative states that dealers conducting background checks for private transfers must contact the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System to determine whether the buyer is eligible to purchase or possess firearms under state and federal law.
“The Background Check Act mandates that the FBI conduct all background checks for personal transfers,†Monica Moazez, spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office, said in a statement. “The FBI, on Dec. 14, informed the Department of Public Safety that it will not conduct these background checks.
“Accordingly, the official Attorney General Opinion concludes that without this central feature … the Background Check Act cannot commence.â€
But unlike retail sales, the initiative states that dealers conducting background checks for private transfers must contact the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System to determine whether the buyer is eligible to purchase or possess firearms under state and federal law.
“The Background Check Act mandates that the FBI conduct all background checks for personal transfers,†Monica Moazez, spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office, said in a statement. “The FBI, on Dec. 14, informed the Department of Public Safety that it will not conduct these background checks.
“Accordingly, the official Attorney General Opinion concludes that without this central feature … the Background Check Act cannot commence.â€
In its letter, the FBI said Nevada is a “point of contact†state that uses the federal NICS system and a state central repository — a database that includes such things as mental health records, domestic violence incidents, misdemeanor criminal records and arrests reports, as well as restraining orders.
“The state of Nevada can provide a more comprehensive NICS check that is accomplished when a (point of contact) accesses state-held databases that are not available to the FBI,†the letter said. “The Nevada DPS is also in a better position for understanding and applying state laws.â€
It concluded that “the recent passage of the Nevada legislation regarding background checks for private sales cannot dictate how federal resources are applied.â€
“The state of Nevada can provide a more comprehensive NICS check that is accomplished when a (point of contact) accesses state-held databases that are not available to the FBI,†the letter said. “The Nevada DPS is also in a better position for understanding and applying state laws.â€
It concluded that “the recent passage of the Nevada legislation regarding background checks for private sales cannot dictate how federal resources are applied.â€

Comment