This is getting to the point where it defies comprehension. Even assuming there was zero wind and the ballistics calculator gave a perfect elevation adjustment, how does one actually ID a target from that distance? Even with a very high powered optic, there's guaranteed to be a decent amount of mirage distortion and a man sized target is still going to appear pretty small.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...way/418889001/
By comparison the guys from Applied Ballistics didn't make any 2 mile hits while shooting in controlled and relatively comfortable conditions. It does sound like there was wind at the King of 2 Miles competition.
https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/...e-competition/
I'd love to hear more details on this Canadian shot. Was it just fired at a group of enemy combatants? What were the conditions like? What type of rifle was used?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...way/418889001/
The 3,450-meter shot, which took about 10 seconds to reach its target, was independently verified by a video camera and other data, the source said.
The prior record was held by a British sniper, Craig Harrison, who in 2009 shot a Taliban gunner from 2,475 meters, or about a mile and a half, away during an operation in Afghanistan.
The prior record was held by a British sniper, Craig Harrison, who in 2009 shot a Taliban gunner from 2,475 meters, or about a mile and a half, away during an operation in Afghanistan.
https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/...e-competition/
All three Applied Ballistics team members had hits at 2011 yards, and two out of three scored first-round hits at 2477 yards. Ballistic prediction technology is undoubtedly advancing, but there is still progress to be made—there were no hits on the “two-mile†(3375-yard) target. About Team Applied Ballistics and their ELR shooting success,
Comment