Tweet
Looks like Franklin armory is making a habit of building firearms based on the wording of the laws that regulate them.
We've been over the SAFE act and NYS firearms laws a lot over the years, but I have no idea if this would work in New Yorkistan or not. Looks like it's good to go in California.
https://www.recoilweb.com/franklin-armory-releases-title-1-firearm-for-california-and-other-gun-oppressed-states-153755.html
We've been over the SAFE act and NYS firearms laws a lot over the years, but I have no idea if this would work in New Yorkistan or not. Looks like it's good to go in California.
https://www.recoilweb.com/franklin-armory-releases-title-1-firearm-for-california-and-other-gun-oppressed-states-153755.html
At this time you might be thinking, “Ho-hum, it’s just a rifle without a stock.â€
Again, it does not meet the legal definition of a rifle, according to 18 US Code 921:
Again, it does not meet the legal definition of a rifle, according to 18 US Code 921:
The term “rifle†means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and made or remade to use the energy of an explosive to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for each single pull of the trigger.
This falls into the territory of a “firearm,†which is not used whatsoever in the language of the CA Assault Weapon Ban.