Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SAFE Act Conviction Overturned

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pissed Off Patriot
    replied
    Originally posted by thughes View Post
    Meanwhile the AW ban in MA was upheld yesterday, a 3 judge State Supreme court panel publishing the decision that included a quote to the effect that "Using an AR or AK to defend one's self inside one's home is akin to using a sledge hammer to crack open a peanut".

    So now the judges get to decide which type of self defense tools are "reasonable" for the serfs to use? This MA decision flies DIRECTLY in the face of Heller. WTF?
    Perhaps they'd prefer I set them on fire with my 200 year old flintlock coach gun, aka the "flamethrower"?

    Leave a comment:


  • camper4lyfe
    replied
    Originally posted by WARFAB View Post

    Good point. The judge basically endorsed using an "assault weapon" for home defense. Who doesn't want a tool that provides an unfair advantage when you life is on the line?
    When it comes to life or death, there’s no such thing as an unfair defensive advantage

    Leave a comment:


  • WARFAB
    replied
    Originally posted by usmcveteran View Post
    ​​​​​​When your life is on the line isn't that what you want? Sounds like an AR or AK are very effective at stopping a threat according to the judge.
    Good point. The judge basically endorsed using an "assault weapon" for home defense. Who doesn't want a tool that provides an unfair advantage when you life is on the line?

    Leave a comment:


  • usmcveteran
    replied
    Originally posted by thughes View Post
    "Using an AR or AK to defend one's self inside one's home is akin to using a sledge hammer to crack open a peanut".
    ​​​​​​When your life is on the line isn't that what you want? Sounds like an AR or AK are very effective at stopping a threat according to the judge.

    Leave a comment:


  • Norm DeGuerre
    replied
    Originally posted by WARFAB View Post
    Is this the same case where the judges were predicting an upcoming SCOTUS determination that 2A cases would require strict scrutiny?
    One may only hope that Clarence Thomas gets to bat on this
    as I have posted before "scrutiny" is an invention of the legal system to make you run through the whole gamut of Courts, if You are fortunate to have the Money
    any 2A Case should require "strict?" scrutiny as it involves a Federal Question ...
    but ..

    Leave a comment:


  • WARFAB
    replied
    Is this the same case where the judges were predicting an upcoming SCOTUS determination that 2A cases would require strict scrutiny? If so, could this ruling just be a way to avoid ruling in a way they know will be overruled in the near future?

    Leave a comment:


  • thughes
    replied
    Originally posted by Norm DeGuerre View Post

    gotta love legal issues
    every court has a different finding !
    SCOTUS needs to bltchslap these state and circuit judges......

    Leave a comment:


  • Norm DeGuerre
    replied
    Originally posted by thughes View Post
    This MA decision flies DIRECTLY in the face of Heller. WTF?
    gotta love legal issues
    every court has a different finding !

    Leave a comment:


  • thughes
    replied
    Meanwhile the AW ban in MA was upheld yesterday, a 3 judge State Supreme court panel publishing the decision that included a quote to the effect that "Using an AR or AK to defend one's self inside one's home is akin to using a sledge hammer to crack open a peanut".

    So now the judges get to decide which type of self defense tools are "reasonable" for the serfs to use? This MA decision flies DIRECTLY in the face of Heller. WTF?

    Leave a comment:


  • camper4lyfe
    replied
    It’s the ruling we wanted. Sadly, the reasoning doesn’t help.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ham_Chu
    started a topic SAFE Act Conviction Overturned

    SAFE Act Conviction Overturned

    https://www.news10.com/news/local-ne...elQJrojZWWDCK4

Working...
X